Where Most People Go Wrong with Cricket Coaching Advice
There is a simple shorthand for what defines a good coach: reputation is everything. We look at a player’s first-class or International record and that helps us decide if we should follow his advice.
But you wouldn’t go to the dentist of you had a broken leg. So why go to a former player to fix your broken technique?
Of course, experience goes a long way but coaching cricket is a completely different set of skills than playing.
A good coach is able identify issues in other people. He can communicate complex information in a manner that is understandable to the audience. He has to be flexible enough to deal with different personalities. He has to be dedicated to the improvement of others through continual development.
Good players may have those skills, but you don’t get them by being able to hit a cricket ball for six or bowl it at 145kph.
The false positive: social proof
Now, I do get it. It’s tough to work out how a good a coach really is until you work with him. One way of deciding is based on the proof that he has coached himself to a high level. The logic is clear; if he knows how to do it, he can show you how to do it.
Many players do know, but many are vague and talk about working hard or just pass on advice that was taught to them by their coaches. There is no critical thinking or analysis. Using a first-class record as proof of coaching skill is fatally flawed.
Meanwhile coaches with a more modest record are ignored. Some of these coaches are much better skilled in developing players than the high-profile names. Look at the likes of PitchVision coaches Gary Palmer, Mark Garaway and Adrian Shaw. Their professional records are variable, but their coaching skills are unmatched.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying all ex-internationals are poor coaches and all lesser skilled cricketers become world-class coaches. Many top players also have great coaching skill-sets.
We just need to recognise that experience has nothing to do with coaching skill.
That way the excellent coaches will rise to the top rather than the ones with the biggest names.
And if you want to get excellent coaching from coaches selected for their coaching abilities rather than their playing reputation, take a look at the PitchVision Academy courses section. Every coach is hand-picked to get you the best experience and the biggest improvement possible.
- Login to post comments
Comments
Its the same in every field - quite often the most talented individuals make poor teachers/coaches. The reason being that for whatever reason the skills just came easily to them, and they never really had to think hard about what it was that they did so well.
Incredibly smart mathematicians often find it inconceiveable that a young student doesn't just what 1534/639 is. Its all so obvious to them, they've never had to think about quick shortcuts or breaking it down into methodical steps. The answer is just there in their head as soon as they read the question.
As you point out, the same applies to sports coaches. To a talented professional player, it must be difficult to conceive how a player can't just step forward and whack the slow half volley to the boundary. Its always just seemed like the easiest thing in the world to them.
I've actually heard a lot of top players actually give really bad and outdated advice.
So have I! That said, I have heard soem great players give away some gems too. So it's not always the case. We just have to recognise there is not much of a connection between Test runs and coaching ability.
As David notes, critical thinking is vital - much of the coaching that children and adults alike receive is handed down from generation to generation without conscious challenging (just like the carbing-up myth!).
Also, poor communication kills [sic] are often a barrier to getting relevant points across, especially when trying to coach a less talented player...
How become a good bollar.
I want good cricket coaching