At Last: Proof that Hammering Length Gets Wickets (And How to Bowl Length Better)
It’s a mantra as old as overarm bowling: Put the ball on a good length for long enough and you will get your rewards. But in a world of slower balls, bouncers and inswinging yorkers, it’s an ideal we have forgotten.
Take Stuart Broad as an example. The England bowler spent a long time trying to work out what kind of role he had. Was he the enforcer; there to bowl bouncers and scare batsmen? Was he a line and length man; using swing and seam movement? How did this role change between formats, if at all?
But it’s also a story which is blown out of proportion, because the mantra is still true: if you hit a good length consistently in any format you will get wickets.
It’s the current plan of the England side, but it also works at lower levels. I saw it myself in a 50 over game I played recently.
Proof length works
Our opening bowler - tall with good pace for non-professional level - had been having an average season. His pace was not up to usual standards and he was bowling too many boundary balls. The previous week he had gone for 11 in 2 overs, giving the opposition a great start.
At the next practice we had talked about how hitting length was more important than line. Good fast bowling in limited overs is not about the unplayable balls, but about staying in the game.
We practiced by monitoring his length on our PitchVision Solo.
Simply by making length his focus, we saw an increase in his success rate. We didn’t look at the line at all, deciding a good length ball outside off stump is as good as one hitting off stump because it’s hard to score.
On the Saturday he was brimming with confidence. We had set a big target to bowl at and he tore in. His opening 6 over spell yielded jumping batsmen, the keeper taking the ball chest high, 3 wickets (all caught behind) and just 7 runs.
And all because he was aiming at a length about 6.5m from the batsman’s stumps.
For me, this proves that when it comes to bowling you need to keep it simple.
How to improve fast bowling length
Practice by bowling without a batsman and tracking your accuracy (either with PitchVision or hand notation). Bowl like this a couple of times a week. Even if a batter is there (say at team nets) pretend that she isn’t. Keep aiming at a good length.
Keep a record of how many balls you bowl in the right place. Aim to improve this percentage with regular practice. Ignore your line as long as you are not bowling wides.
Then, when you are playing, just hit length. It doesn’t matter if you bowl at 145kph or 65kph. You will get results, and you will get them quickly.
What more proof can you need?
- Login to post comments
Comments
6.5 Meters from the Batsmens's Stumps sounds like a Long Hop unsless your Club Bowler is Quick? What is his speed?
What is the Minimum Speed you have to bowl to hit 6.5 Meters Length and not give the Batsmen enough time?
I am a little scared to bowl at 6.5 Meters Length at my Military Medium Pace of 55MPH.
We have done extensive research into what makes a good length. In pro cricket with quicker bowling and better wickets the best area to bowl is 6-8m back from the batsman's stumps. In non-professional cricket this length creeps up by half a metre so your target area is 5.5-7.5m.
At that range the numbers clearly show the highest strike rate for all seam/swing bowlers at non-professional speeds on all wickets (somewhere between 80-120kph).
2m is a wide target area so you may need to consider bowling at the fuller end of that range if you are medium pace. However, batsman struggle to score if you land the ball in this area 5 balls out of 6 every over (the 6th ball is ideally a fuller variation rather than a rank half volley!)
If you bowl fuller than this your strike rate drops significantly.
David,
Thanks for the input. 5.5 - 7.5 Meters it is then.
Will stick to it even if my Club Mates keep saying it's short.
Sunil
I think we found that for spinners the ideal length was 8 foot to 11 foot from the stumps, which is 2.5 to 4 metres, roughly. Thats quite a big jump of length of 3m just for an extra 5mph?
I would have thought a 55mph delivery pitching at 6 metres from the stumps would get smashed over midwicket more often than not?
8 foot from the stumps sounds too close - if the batsman gets in a good stride he's going to get to the pitch of the ball every time. 3-4 metres (10-14feet) is more realistic.
At 55mph you're probably going to want to err on the side of full (5.5m), especially on slow pitches
This is where PitchVision comes in so handy. There is no discussion about what you THINK the best length might be, you just look at the stats.